...with Chad Frame

Chad Fra

Chad Frame

Chad Frame’s work appears in Rattle, Pedestal, Mom Egg Review, Philadelphia Stories, Barrelhouse, Rust+Moth, and other journals and anthologies, as well as on iTunes from the Library of Congress. He is the Director of the Montgomery County Poet Laureate Program and Poet Laureate Emeritus of Montgomery County. He is also the Poetry Editor of Ovunque Siamo: New Italian-American Writing, a founding member of the No River Twice poetry improv performance troupe, and founder of the Caesura Poetry Festival and Retreat.

We met Chad a number of years back through various Bucks County poetry workshops and readings. We were immediately taken by the manner in which his work incorporates voice and a strong use of imagery. His contributions to poetry and poets on the county, state, and national levels speak for themselves. Chad’s poem, “Harmonica Man,” appears in Issue 3.1 of River Heron Review.

RHR: What is the best piece of writing advice you have ever been given?

Chad Frame: "Be more vulnerable." For a long time, I was too distant from my poetry. I treated poems as puzzles to put together, and I was engaging with the page and the reader intellectually, but not emotionally. A poem must necessarily do both.

It wasn't until I started writing from personal experience and really opening up that my work really resonated with an audience. It may seem like an overly simplistic mantra, but every time I follow it, I find success.

RHR: Tell us about your writing process.

Chad Frame: My process can vary wildly, but usually I have an idea or line I've been mulling over for a while that eventually troubles me enough that I sit down to write a poem. When I do, the poem generally happens in one sitting. I've been told this is an enviable quality by many poets, but honestly, it's always been how it happens for me. The tradeoff of this, however, is that I can't really schedule writing time--it tends to happen of its own accord. This makes it difficult when dealing with deadlines or focusing on specific projects, but I compensate by having several plates spinning at a time, so I can switch as inspiration strikes. I also do a lot of research for any given poem. I'm sure I'm not alone in having dozens of browser tabs open on my computer or phone at any given time, but it's become integral to the process. Of course, this is in addition to countless physical books (usually several at once), graphic novels (of which I'm a huge fan), and audiobooks (storytime while driving!) simultaneously, any of which could--and often do--spark ideas.

RHR: Does an idea for a poem haunt you or do you hunt for an idea? Usually the former, though I'm no stranger to the hunt.

Chad Frame: I'm fond of prompts, and love a challenge to write outside my comfort zone. I also write a lot of found poetry whenever I hit a wall with my more conventional work. Writing a cento, for example, is an easy way to still engage creatively even while otherwise afflicted with writer's block. I keep a lot of lists of quotes and found lines just in case I ever decide to Frankenstein them into a poem some day (with attribution, of course). Essentially, I won't turn down an idea from any source. I'm happy when they haunt me, but also happy to seek them out when they're less forthcoming.

RHR: How do you arrive at a title for a poem?

Chad Frame: I usually have the title in mind before I write a poem, strangely enough, and it tends to shape what I write. I'm not always sure where they come from. I'll get it in my head that I'm going to write a poem called, for example, "Two-Step Charlie" (which is the title poem from my forthcoming chapbook about my father's death), because I remembered a story my father told about his platoon-mates in Vietnam telling him after he woke up that a huge snake slithered over him in his sleeping bag. I researched all the indigenous snakes, and then read up on the fascinating lore surrounding the many-banded krait, which the American servicemen called "Two-Step Charlie," out of the mistaken belief that anyone bitten could only walk two steps before dropping dead from its venom. The phrase lent itself to a metaphor about his second bout with cancer being the one that ultimately claimed his life, and the poem sort of came about organically from there. Usually, I'll hear a word or phrase and decide it should inspire a poem, and then jot that title down and let it torture me until I feel I have no choice but to write the whole poem in one sitting.

RHR: Do you believe a poem can be overly crafted?

Chad Frame: In a word, no. But I do believe a poem can look overly crafted.

Craft, when properly applied, should look effortless. It's the equivalent of spending an inordinate amount of time styling one's hair to give the illusion of perfectly disheveled bedhead. I like to think of myself as a "sneaky Neoformalist." With few exceptions, my poems have strict craft rules I set for myself like syllabics (almost always, I write in ten syllable lines, regardless of stresses). I'm fond of literary devices and sonic cohesion, but I try to work these aspects in subtly. Just because I've studied an obnoxious amount of the Classics and happen to know what a synchysis, chiasmus, or zeugma is doesn't mean I'm going to make it obvious when I use any of them in a poem. I work very hard to sneak in as many elements of craft as I can while maintaining accessibility and the general cadence of speech in my poetry. The end result--I hope--is a poem accessible and aesthetically pleasing upon a cursory reading, but which rewards the close and studied reading with significantly more depth.

RHR: How do you determine what makes a poem successful?

Chad Frame: Well, publication is probably the most obvious measure, but I don't think it's the most accurate. As an editor myself, I know publications can reject work for any number of reasons, some of which can be as arbitrary as an unintended oversight in submission guidelines, or because they already have a poem about a similar topic accepted for a given issue. It may not be one editor's cup of tea, but may otherwise resonate a lot with an audience.

Ultimately, to me, what makes a poem successful is accessibility. I don't like writing poems just for other poets to read. I want to write poems that cause people to say things like, "I don't really read poetry, but I liked this." Or to say, "I went through something similar." I want poetry to resonate, to touch on both the personal and the profound, to demonstrate both narrative cohesion and crafted, lyric beauty. I never listen to feedback and think, "Well, you're just not the target audience." Frankly, my target is everyone.

With my most recent manuscript, I wanted to chronicle my father's death, ranging from childhood memories establishing our (at times strained) relationship, to terminal diagnosis, to hospice, to eventual death, and the aftermath. I think these poems are successful in that they served as therapy for me while all this was going on, they serve as a memorial for my father, they're pleasing enough (I hope!) as poems to anyone reading them, and they remain to offer guidance and support to anyone going through a similar loss. Successful poetry, I believe, attempts much and achieves at least a portion of that ambition. That risk is inextricably part of the process.

RHR: How do you know when a poem has reached an end?

Chad Frame: My writing tends to have a narrative to it more often than not, so I'll usually end a poem when the story I'm trying to impart comes to its end. When I'm writing more abstractly, I suppose I feel drawn to end on an impactful line. This may seem obvious, but it isn't always easy to recognize or determine. I try to bear in mind that it's usually the last line (or at least last few lines) that the reader remembers, and I try to make them count.

RHR: Should writers keep or discard their old notebooks over the years?

Chad Frame: I'd be mortified if anyone advocated for throwing away their notebooks! Why do that? Inspiration can come from anywhere, and even if I do tend to cringe at some of my older work, I can't say I won't revisit it from time to time to edit, rework, or even shamelessly lift one or two of my own lines for use in something current. Even if we don't treat everything as grist for the mill (and don't get me wrong, we absolutely should), that writing, those scribbled notes, and even the doodles in the margin should be kept as a chronicle of the time they were written. I may admittedly take this too far in saving just about everything, but I rarely have organized notebooks. Despite all the nice journals I've been given as gifts over the years, I still tend to do most of my writing on any scrap of paper that comes to hand. This is why I get paranoid if anyone ever decides to "help" me clean up. I even catch myself frantically going through piles and even the trash to make sure no "important" scrap of paper was discarded.

RHR: Whose name do you invoke at your shrine to poetry?

Chad Frame:
Without question, the Roman poet Catullus has resonated with me more than any poet from any time. I studied and translated him extensively in high school and college, and still do to this day, and that his work remains relevant and accessible over two thousand years later is nothing short of miraculous. Catullus may not have started the Neoteric movement in his day, but he was certainly one of its most prominent practitioners. No poet since has been as good, in my opinion, at shifting from comedy to tragedy, wooing to invective, satire to earnestness. From the timeless and heart-rending beauty of his elegy-as-eulogy for his brother in Carmina 101 to the perfectly composed elegiac couplet of Carmina 85: Ōdī et amō. Quārē id faciam fortasse requīris. / Nesciō, sed fierī sentiō et excrucior. What else is there to say? I hate and I love. Why do I do this, you may ask. / I don't know, but I feel it happening, and I am consumed.

By itself, it's beautiful and profound. But in the context of his collection, it's the climax--the clutch in breath after the rhythm of in-out, in-out for page after page of alternating between longing, musing, and even throwing shade at other poets or men-about-town. He shows the full range of poetic technique and human emotion throughout his book, but also specifically in the microcosm of this one poem. It's brilliant.


Read him--in any language. You won't be disappointed.

RHR: Notebook paper or computer? Pen or pencil?

Chad Frame: Any and all! I write on the computer and my phone, I email and text ideas to myself, and I've even written poems on my smartwatch or gaming console, when we're talking digital. When it comes to analog, I write on anything I can. In margins, on scraps of paper, on receipts, and I even have one of those waterproof shower notepads. As I mentioned before, people like to give me nice journals for all gift-giving occasions. Truth be told, though, I rarely use them. I have some strange anxiety about writing in them, and usually default to a cheap college-ruled notebook or the aforementioned scraps when writing. I'm equally happy with a pen or pencil, but I'm particular about the type I use of each. I love the Bic .5mm mechanical pencils (the ones with the different colored clips) and Uni-Ball Signo black gel pens, and buy both in absurd quantities, then proceed to bafflingly lose them at almost the same rate.


Read Chad Frame’s poem, “Wisdom”:

Wisdom


The doctors for his palliative care
review options in a small room reserved
for this at the end of the hall, but I

stare past them at the painting on the wall
of a flaking farmhouse, a drab grass field,
an overturned white rowboat, basically

Wyeth's Christina's World if Christina
were an overturned white rowboat. Okay,
I hear someone say, and realize it's me.

We return to tell my father, wired
to the bed, gaunt as picked chicken breast, arm
raised, rattling chains from a hoist above him

like some Dickensian ghost. A beep sounds,
insistent, of something being released
in his bloodstream. He flips it off, finger

shaking like a baby bird, and grumbles
Blow it out your ass, voice heavy with phlegm
and pain. We're going to move you, I say.

I hold his hand as nurses wheel the bed
through the halls to his final apartment,
and he tells me a story—or maybe

it's the morphine telling me a story.
Either way, an old plumber he met once
gave him three pieces of advice. Shit stinks—

and I smile at this, long ago immune
to the mingled stench of bile and bowels
from colon cancer—Water flows downhill.

He pauses, drawn face twisting in a wince.
And the third thing? I prompt, when it passes.
Don't bite your fingernails, he says, eyes closed.

My other hand quickly drops from my mouth
to my side, fingertips still sore and wet.
Wise man, I say, giving his hand a squeeze.

...with Emari DiGiorgio

DSC_6554.jpg

Emari DiGiorgio

Emari DiGiorgio is the author of two poetry collections, Girl Torpedo, winner of the Numinous Orison, Luminous Origin Literary Award, and The Things a Body Might Become. She is the recipient of the Auburn Witness Poetry Prize, the Ellen La Forge Memorial Poetry Prize, the Elinor Benedict Poetry Prize, the NJ Poetry Prize, RHINO’s Founder’s Prize, and a poetry fellowship from the New Jersey State Council on the Arts. She teaches at Stockton University, is a Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation Poet. She hosts World Above, a monthly reading series in Atlantic City, NJ.

Most recently, she’s read in the Wild & Precious Reading Series, Get Fresh Books Instagram Series, and Murphy Writing's Virtual Friday Night Series, and will soon be hosting a workshop for Wild & Precious.

We first met Emari and experienced her poetry several years ago at Peter Murphy’s Winter Poetry and Prose Get-a-way where she did readings and facilitated poetry writing workshops. We were immediately taken by her powerful use of accessible and multifaceted language.

RHR: Tell us about your writing process.

Emari DiGiorgio: These days, I am not writing poems as often as I might like. I’m the grievance officer of my union, and I’m running first-grade-at-home during quarantine. I will carry an idea or image in my head for a few days. Sometimes I’ll jot a few key phrases or images in the Notes section of my phone and look up things that might inform the idea, such as which kinds of snakes might have lived in ancient Mesopotamia or how we know dark matter exists. Then, I will actually block two hours on my calendar and shut my office door. My daughter calls this my “independent work,” since I am not teaching or in a Zoom meeting. 

In that two-hour block, I’ll start with a handwritten draft because I’m less likely to censor myself, to tell myself that an idea or image is silly or wrong. This will usually be in a prose block. I’m just trying to get the material I’ve been accumulating out. I’ll write until I feel like I have nothing else to say and then try to write a little more. Then, I’ll read through and identify the best images and the strongest music in the draft. I’ll type these into a Word document. Sometimes I’ll write something entirely new with the four or five lines I’ve plucked; other times, the poem will be a collage of that original draft, pulling lines from throughout. I rarely arrive at a full draft in my two-hour block, but the progress of having something on the page will inspire me to block another two hours later in the week. 

Sometimes poems take me many, many drafts. I like order and control, and poems are wild. The sooner I can abandon what I think a poem is about, the sooner I will discover what it’s actually about. 

RHR: What is the best piece of writing advice you have ever been given?

Emari DiGiorgio: When I was a graduate student, I was fortunate to study with Marie Howe. Once in office hours, she asked me, “Where is the woman in these poems?” I was confused; there were women in my poems. However, she was asking me something else. She was asking me to own the voices and stories on the page. It was an invitation to value my story and perspective, to write it unapologetically. 

RHR: Does an idea for a poem haunt you or do you hunt for an idea? 

Emari DiGiorgio: I am haunted by ideas, but I hunt for an entry into the idea. These days, I’m trying to write into white complicity. But why do I need/want to write about this and what might I discover about myself and whiteness? How can I engage with this idea without making it a story about white tears? Recently, I was taking an online writing class that explored form–traditional and invented–with Stephanie Cawley (she’s amazing), and one of our assignments was to pick a “borrowed form.” I’ve spent so much time reading recipes trying to mix-up our quarantine kitchen that I was drawn to borrow from the recipe form, and suddenly, I knew exactly how to enter an idea I’ve been carrying for months: Assimilation (Italian Style). Each previous time I tried to write about the conscious and unconscious ways that Italian Americans traded their culture and roots to earn their whiteness, I couldn’t find a poem, just an idea. But as a recipe, something integral to my identity as an Italian-American, I found an entry to explore the complexities of assimilation. 

RHR: How do you know when a poem has reached an end?

Emari DiGiorgio: When I used to play softball, I knew as soon as my bat made contact with the ball if I’d driven it safely into the outfield. Everything in my body felt lined up–feet pivoting, hips turning, arms fully extended. Something similar happens when a poem has reached its end. Everything feels lined up–the rhythms of the poem are linked to the emotional/narrative arc, the line breaks create tension or surprise, and the images feel essential. There’s a little magic in reading it. 

RHR: How do you determine what makes a poem successful?

Emari DiGiorgio: It’s interesting to modify “poem” with “successful.” Perhaps because “success” feels goal-oriented, or in our culture, connected to money or acclaim. I’ve heard Gregory Pardlo talk about how the best poems resonate in the head, heart, and body, as in we experience them intellectually, emotionally, and viscerally. Are all poems meant to be experienced this way? I’m not sure. I would say that a successful poem arrives at its form and images so that they seem inseparable, that it had to be written exactly this way. Though truly, if someone stays after a reading or contacts me via email or social media to tell me how much one of my poems affected them, I would say that poem was successful because it bridged the shared experiences of strangers. 

***

Read Emari DiGiorgio’s poem, "Punchline" which originally appeared in the Southern Humanities Review (Volume 50.1&2) and was awarded the 2016 Auburn Witness Poetry Prize. It was subsequently published in her poetry collection, Girl Torpedo.

Punchline

The joke wishes it wasn’t the joke.

It calls a helpline—the joke wants to punch
a bullet through its brow, and it’s hard for the operator
to talk the joke down. She says, help is on the way.

No, don’t send the cops. But it’s too late. The joke
doesn’t have enough pills or a tongue to swallow them.
The joke doesn’t have knees to pray. A black man
and a Hispanic are riding in a car. Leave it there.
Leave them in the Sentra at the QuikChek. Let them
drop off their kids at school. Let the cops

bust down the joke’s door. Who’s driving?
Who the fuck is driving this joke?

                                                          What a relief.
The black man and the Hispanic are both breathing, cuffed
upright in the back of a cruiser. No blood on the cop’s hands.

Let’s make you the cop. Let’s make you the law.
What sound does a body make when it’s in a chokehold?

A black cop is driving his Hispanic partner. A white cop
is driving himself crazy. He’s tired of telling the same group
of young men to stop loitering on the platform. Every night,
just milling around, blocking people, pushing, shoving
each other, a game, intimidating passengers.

Today you’re the black man. You’ve read the script, memorized
your lines, Yes, officer, perfected the least intimidating pitch,
a walk that won’t draw attention, should you enter
a convenience store, a bank.

The car is driving itself. The car is the joke.
The tires smoke and the brakes sink to the floorboard.

Two cops are in a car—this one isn’t a joke (turns out
the first one wasn’t either)—parked, gunned down.
As if these young men’s deaths will bring another
back to his children. Some illogical exchange
fallen angels run.

                                    A black car, driving rain,
eye whites, night, the drawbridge of gritted teeth opening,
no such thing as bulletproof words, floodlight, that
deer stare, the moment before a buck turns, threatened,
having done nothing.

                                    This joke is a loaded Glock 19.
Between box spring and mattress, in the glove box.
A siren wails. Two cops sit in a car. Two cops die in a car.
This isn’t a joke. This was supposed to be a joke.
We were supposed to laugh and say, Oh, that’s not right,
and shake our heads and go on with our days, all of us--
black man, Hispanic, cop, you, reader, sitting there
waiting for the punch line, the big haha aha.

Maybe you’re saying, No, that’s not funny, or
It’s true, you know. Maybe you’re telling the joke.

When the cops arrive the joke is sobbing. The joke asks
to be locked up. It won’t tell itself anymore. It wants
a new punch line. It wants to reform itself, to be
elegy for cop, black man, his panic.

~ fini ~

...with Jonathan Andrew Pérez

River+Heron+Review+Photo+JPerez.jpg

Jonathan Andrew Pérez

Jonathan Andrew Pérez, Esq.’s work has appeared in POETRY, Split Lip Magazine, Prelude, The Write Launch, TRACK // FOUR, The Tulane Review, The Florida Review’s Latinx publication, Barnhouse, The Tiny Journal, The Chicago Quarterly Review and numerous others. He is a 2019 Pushcart Prize Poetry Nominee and has been featured in Crack the Spine’s Anthology of the Year for 2019.

His debut poetry collection,
Cartographer of Crumpled Maps: The Justice Elegies (Finishing Line Press, 2020) will be released in March 2020, although pre-orders are being taken now.

Jonathan Andrew Pérez first came to our attention when his poem, “Beasts of the American Wilderness“, appeared in Issue 2.1 of River Heron Review. We were taken with his use of imagery and language to speak to a sense of history and the past. His work appears consistently in national journals, reviews, and anthologies. His new collection, Cartographer of Crumpled Maps: The Justice Elegies (Finishing Line Press, 2020) speaks to his experiences as a trial attorney as well as his keen eye for the world’s injustices.

RHR: Tell us about your writing process.

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: As a senior trial attorney devoted to Social Justice policy I develop policy and am actively involved in the intersection of procedural justice and cultural trauma at the forefront of the criminal justice reform movement. My first published book of poetry is slated for March 2020 from Finishing Line Press.  

The writing process, for me, is very routine.  I am an amalgamation of my routine – and in the spirit of sharing and community:

  • Title and subject/ as I walk around the week, a thought about a poetic subject, a title, or a series of poems, I write it into my I Phone notes. 

  • I have a series of folders on my desktop one to twelve, “I- XII”, each marks the migration of title poems from beginning to end.  The poems stay in the “funnel” and move up toward completion. If they are not working out, I sometimes combine poems.

  • They go into what I call the “Freeze Locker” once they are published.

My revisiting of poems really relates to the amount of time I have had them in the “funnel.”  I update them as time progresses and sometimes create new material by “blowing up” old poems.

To be honest, I believe the internal rhyme and foundation of a poem absolutely cannot be created on the first pass. The foundation usually comes out after some time revising and revisiting. Usually a poem has an internal logic. My personal interests veer toward nature, colonization, ecological crises, the U.S. history of race and systemic inequity, so I usually try to find a vehicle for these ideas, and movements.  

Lastly, I read! I read my favorite poems over and over again, and try new genres, and incorporate them into my writing. At all times, I push my vocabulary, visual, and rhythmic muscle. Break tradition!

RHR: Does an idea for a poem haunt you or do you hunt for an idea?

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: An idea for a poem haunts me! I feel like I’ve been writing the same poem over and over, in different variations. The poems are like blocks going block-by-block mapping out my work. I am still obsessed with roughly what could be called “the Criminal Justice Pastoral” or, “The Anxiety of White Privilege.” Strangely, that was also the name of my Master’s thesis at UVA, as a graduate student in English and American Studies.  

I am fascinated by the way the urban environment, sociology, consciousness, community, and inequity, could come through the aesthetic disruptions of poems.  I am also obsessed with artists like WALTON FORD, who brings in politics, sociological statements, and radical disruptions to the traditional pastoral of Audubon’s prints. 

RHR: Do you believe a poem can be overly crafted?

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: Absolutely not. Unless yes. I believe the use of techniques that are the-opposite-of-chaotic and which some might see as overwrought- like sonnets, erasure-poems, centos, crostics, the cut-up poem, and ekphrasis to speak from a point of view that is under-represented and newly found in the poetry community offer vehicles to some of the most creative works.  (See Nicole Sealey’s ekphrasis work, or any number of erasure or cut-ups like Tracy K Smith, or the L-A-N-G-U-A-G-E poets.  

One of my favorites to read, in my chaotic process is the black out processes, and to use online-generator like e-diastic from L-A-N-G-U-A-G-E poet Jackson MacLow.

RHR: What is the role of justice in poetry?

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: My latest project is a book of poetry, The Cartographer of Crumpled Maps: The Justice Elegies and is “focused on the meeting of the pastoral, law, justice and the reclaiming of history for communities that have been on the wrong side of justice.” My goal is to combine the mythos of the Savior, Hero, and extra-worldly fable to interrupt critical moments in the history of systemic inequity in the U.S. This debut book is a culmination of all the internal narratives and pursuits throughout the years. In it, the narrator travels through early slavery accounts, Jim Crow, the Great Migration, and maps a consciousness of communities in large urban areas that have been alienated, in form and geography, because of systemic inequity.

During my day job, I develop policy and am actively involved in the intersection of procedural justice and cultural trauma, and at the forefront of the criminal justice reform movement.

In each poem, the pastoral features prominently as a metaphor and a historical moment from racial oppression. The work, I hope, will allow the reader to envision a reclaiming of the painful experiences that communities of color had been subject to, while also envisioning a rewriting of the history with a new future of both moral and environmental ownerships over the many landscapes that have marginalized and oppressed communities.

RHR: . How do you determine what makes a poem successful?

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: The simple answer is that it is finished when it is published. But then, the question is, where is it published? Secondly, despite publication…the poem itself is a living breathing entity. It lives in the world, and it fits with your block-by-block world that you created in the sequence of other poems. Are there any accents you can add? Any dressing or framing that would it make it fit in the entire family of work or, using the older metaphor, fit in the neighborhood and architecture of the entire sequence.?

RHR: Should writers keep or discard their old notebooks over the years?

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: Absolutely KEEP. I am now on folder number 12, or what I call “individual poems XII” which are worked, and reworked recycled poems that travel on my desktop through the systems of folders until they are published. Then I do less editing on them. Some of these are five years old, or more. However, over time, I have been shifting and reworking the poem.  

A lot of times, when I think of the whole “world” of my poems and put two up side-by-side, I see similarities and lineages. Since I began writing I have been obsessed with the world of race, justice, and natural environments in U.S. History. I personally take my metaphors and motifs from the natural world and 19th century American Renaissance-type poems (Whitman, who has inherited Wordsworth and Keats) to American Modernist poems obsessed with symbolism (Wallace Stevens and Hart Crane), then rework them as contemporary issues of race, justice, and law. 

This is where my poem you see here (below): “The Bobolinks as a Flock of Signifiers” has come from.  My debut book is based on this same motif, often each poem dedicated to a single bird species, or migratory avian flock, and the poem itself has historical nods to U.S. systemic inequity, in particular Jim Crow, U.S. Slavery, and later forms of de jure segregation like housing politics. 

I truly believe that whatever is your influence, aesthetic, or politically-motivated, and the change you narrative and pain or joy you wish to transfer to a poet-audience should be alive in your work. 

RHR: Whose name do you invoke at your shrine to poetry?

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: the contemporary poetry of Cortney Lamar Charleston, Hanif Abdurraqib, Ada Limon, Jericho Brown, Nicole Sealey, Terrance Hayes' Sonnets, Reginald Dwayne Betts' Yale Law fellow, and poet-author of "Felon" against earlier Afro-American and Latinx writers in the Harlem Renaissance and California Chicano/a movement, such as Langston Hughes, Gwendolyn Brooks, Gloria Anzaldua, and the New York Lower East Side writers loosely associated with the Puerto Rican poetry collective.

RHR: Notebook or paper or computer? Pen or Pencil?

Jonathan Andrew Pérez: Believe it or not, I am all DIGITAL baby!  I use my I Phone notepad for notes when I think about a poem subject, or poem title, or a few lines as I walk around during the day or wake up in the middle of the night. Then I transfer them into my 12-folder sequence, and move it up the ranks. 

~~~

Read Jonathan Andrews Perez’s poem, “These Signifiers as a Flock of Bobolinks” which appeared in POETRY (January 2020):

These Signifiers as a Flock of Bobolinks

This neighborhood map thrives on rising sentences,
arbitrary Icterid with signified arms; Ventriloquist!
shook-throated, a rock-hard reed-lance thorn by the landfill—
a bird almost-mistook-for erasure shared in a thin migration,
like marauding packs of boys who fight or make out, discover song, hinge:
on the talk or sheen of feeling, grass-rooted as if contra-the-wind enough to prevent erasure?
Its moat of fear, reinvented burps, throbbing streetlamp burst on the fritz,
the self-appointed-like throat, chewed on ambition, held choked as a corn-flavored chip,

fed and left to dust the milk of the park, where seaward, another earth throws shade:
the moon, almost, or a hurricane, we dawn and we signify our own sentences’
justice, justice, built on migration from conjugations the winds once institutionally appointed:
at last—this hurricane!

from POETRY (January 2020)

This poem also appears in Jonathan Andrew Pérez, Esq.’s debut poetry collection, Cartographer of Crumpled Maps: The Justice Elegies (Finishing Line Press, March 2020).


~ fini ~